In a nation grappling with its worst economic crisis in decades, Ghana’s newly elected President John Mahama has announced plans to investigate the contentious $400 million National Cathedral project initiated by his predecessor, Nana Akufo-Addo. This project, envisioned as a monumental religious edifice, has become a flashpoint in national discourse, highlighting governance lapses, economic mismanagement, and public discontent, according to experts.
The cathedral, which Akufo-Addo pledged to build in gratitude for his party’s 2016 electoral success, has faced significant backlash due to its scale and financial implications. Though originally proposed as a privately funded venture, revelations that over $58 million in public funds had been funneled into the project without adequate transparency have sparked widespread criticism. Critics argue that the cathedral epitomizes misplaced priorities in a country where citizens are struggling with soaring inflation, mounting debt, and the basic costs of living.
President Mahama’s electoral victory, largely seen as a public rebuke of Akufo-Addo’s economic policies, has created an opportunity for a renewed focus on fiscal responsibility. At a recent thanksgiving service, Mahama emphasized the need for accountability, announcing plans to scrutinize the cathedral’s finances and reevaluate its feasibility. “We can reach a more reasonable figure for achieving such a project, but only with full transparency and regard for national interests,” Mahama stated.
The proposed investigation also reflects growing concerns about governance practices under the previous administration. Ghana’s Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) had recommended an audit of the project late last year, citing procurement irregularities and potential financial impropriety. Mahama’s government appears poised to act on these recommendations, signaling a broader commitment to institutional integrity.
Situated on a sprawling 23,000-square-meter site in central Accra, the cathedral was intended to house a 5,000-seat auditorium, chapels, a choir school, and cultural spaces. However, the project has been beset by delays, with construction grinding to a halt and the site now little more than an abandoned excavation. Contractors have reportedly ceased work due to unpaid bills, while at least five members of the board of trustees have resigned, citing concerns over governance and financial transparency.
Recommended Stories
For many Ghanaians, the controversy surrounding the cathedral is emblematic of broader governance failures. Emmanuel Wilson Jnr, a leading anti-corruption campaigner, described the project as a case study in poor decision-making. “This cathedral represents everything wrong with governance—opaque processes, lack of accountability, and misplaced priorities,” Wilson argued. “Investigating this project isn’t just about the money; it’s about restoring public trust.”
The outcry against the cathedral has grown louder in light of Ghana’s ongoing economic challenges. Last year, the country secured a $3 billion bailout from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to stabilize its economy. New Finance Minister Cassiel Ato Forson has vowed to cut wasteful expenditures, explicitly identifying the cathedral as a project that no longer warrants public funding. “The government cannot justify pouring scarce resources into an unfinished project when Ghanaians are struggling to afford basic necessities,” Forson told a parliamentary committee.
While Mahama’s announcement has been met with widespread support, it has also raised questions about potential politicization. Kwame Asah-Asante, a political scientist at the University of Ghana, noted that the investigation could either serve as a precedent for accountability or devolve into a political weapon. “Mahama is tapping into public frustration over governance failures, but he must ensure that this process is handled transparently to avoid accusations of bias,” Asah-Asante said.
The debate over the cathedral also reflects deeper tensions within Ghanaian society, where over 70% of the population identifies as Christian. While some view the project as a potential national symbol, others argue that it represents extravagance in the face of widespread poverty. As Ghana continues to navigate its economic crisis, public sentiment is shifting decisively against projects perceived as disconnected from immediate national needs.
Ultimately, the fate of the National Cathedral may hinge on Mahama’s ability to balance fiscal prudence with cultural sensitivity. For many, the investigation is not merely about the project itself but about addressing systemic governance failures that have long undermined public confidence. In this sense, the National Cathedral has become more than a physical structure—it is a symbol of the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for Ghana’s democracy.
