Rwanda is demanding a hefty £50 million ($63 million) from the UK after Prime Minister Keir Starmer pulled the plug on a controversial asylum deal. The agreement, initially signed under the previous Conservative government, was meant to send illegal migrants to Rwanda in exchange for substantial payments. However, despite UK taxpayers already forking out £700 million ($890 million) for the scheme, only four people were ever relocated under a voluntary program. With Starmer’s government making it clear that no further payments will be made, Rwanda is now insisting that the UK settles outstanding dues.
The diplomatic fallout escalated when Britain paused some bilateral aid to Rwanda, citing concerns over its alleged involvement in the conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Rwanda, accused of backing the M23 rebel group that has seized key areas in eastern Congo since January, has consistently denied the allegations. The Rwandan government maintains that its actions are purely defensive, aimed at neutralizing threats from hostile armed groups operating across the border.
Rwandan officials were quick to slam the UK’s move, arguing that halting aid was a punitive decision that undermines trust and compromises national security. They insist that Britain is reneging on its commitments and that the asylum deal included payments due in April, which should still be honored. While the UK technically has the option to opt out of the agreement by covering relocation costs, it has made no indication that it plans to do so.
The UK-Rwanda asylum deal had long been a source of controversy, criticized by human rights organizations and deemed unworkable by legal experts. The arrangement faced multiple legal challenges in British courts, with the Supreme Court ruling against its implementation over concerns about Rwanda’s human rights record. The plan was a centerpiece of the Conservative government’s immigration policy, aimed at deterring illegal crossings of the English Channel, but it ultimately collapsed under legal, ethical, and political pressures.
For Rwanda, the asylum deal was about more than just money—it was a demonstration of its ambition to be seen as a global player in migration management. The Rwandan government had presented itself as a willing partner in helping the UK address its immigration crisis, but with Britain now turning its back, Kigali finds itself demanding compensation for what it sees as an unfair withdrawal.
Recommended Stories
The dispute over the asylum deal adds another layer of tension to the already strained UK-Rwanda relationship. Britain’s decision to cut some aid over Rwanda’s alleged support for M23 has only deepened frustrations in Kigali. Rwanda insists that the allegations are politically motivated, driven by regional rivalries and international pressure rather than factual evidence. Meanwhile, the UK maintains that its aid pause is a necessary response to Rwanda’s actions in Congo, emphasizing the need for accountability and stability in the region.
As the diplomatic standoff continues, both sides are digging in. Rwanda, feeling shortchanged, is making it clear that it expects the UK to honor financial commitments. The UK, under Starmer’s leadership, is trying to move past a failed policy while avoiding further financial entanglements. Whether Rwanda succeeds in securing its demanded £50 million remains uncertain, but what is clear is that the asylum deal has left both nations with more questions than answers—and a hefty bill that no one wants to pay.
