Once hailed as Africa’s richest woman, Isabel dos Santos now finds herself embroiled in a battle to clear her name amid a storm of allegations, legal struggles, and frozen assets. In January 2021, her removal from Forbes’ billionaire rankings marked a dramatic shift in the 51-year-old Angolan entrepreneur’s fortunes. Dos Santos, the eldest daughter of Angola’s long-serving former president, Jose Eduardo dos Santos, amassed her wealth through strategic investments across Angola and Portugal, including in key sectors like banking, telecommunications, and the state oil giant Sonangol.
Forbes first recognized Isabel’s financial dominance in 2013, tracing her burgeoning fortune back to deals that were made under her father’s regime, which spanned nearly four decades. Her wealth grew exponentially with high-stakes investments, and by 2019, she had expanded her empire to include significant holdings in Portugal’s Nos, a major broadband and cable television company. In her 30s, she made it onto Forbes’ list as Africa’s youngest billionaire. Despite facing accusations of benefiting from her father’s political power, she presented herself as a self-made businesswoman and a pioneering force in Angola’s private sector. Dos Santos took pride in her role as Angola’s largest private employer, claiming to have created over 200,000 jobs in the country.
However, it wasn’t long before her fortune began to unravel. The allegations against Isabel dos Santos gained significant traction in 2020 with the release of the “Luanda Leaks,” an exposé published by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) that revealed how the tycoon allegedly siphoned hundreds of millions of dollars from state-run companies. The British government soon took action, sanctioning Dos Santos and freezing her assets. The UK Foreign Secretary accused her of embezzling at least £350 million, and the Angolan authorities charged her with embezzlement and money laundering. The charges claim that she exploited her father’s influence for personal enrichment, a pattern that critics argue epitomizes the nepotism that defined the reign of her father.
Dos Santos vehemently denies these charges. In an interview with the BBC, she insisted that she had never been found guilty of any crime in any court and labeled the actions against her as politically motivated. She pointed to the government of current President JoãoLourenço, who had launched an anti-corruption drive that targeted her and her family. According to Dos Santos, Lourenço betrayed her father’s legacy by blaming all the country’s woes on the previous regime while maintaining a close connection to the ruling MPLA party, which had been in power throughout her father’s presidency.
Her tenure at the helm of Sonangol, Angola’s state oil company, proved particularly controversial. Appointed in 2016, Dos Santos was tasked with turning the struggling company around. While some viewed her appointment as nepotism, others believed she had the expertise to bring about meaningful change. Her critics, however, claim that her leadership at Sonangol was marked by financial mismanagement, with funds allegedly diverted into personal accounts.
In addition to the financial blows, Dos Santos faced personal tragedies, including the deaths of her husband in a diving accident and her father in 2022. The tumult of recent years has led to further complications, including an Interpol-issued Red Notice that would see her arrested if she returns to Angola. Though she insists on her innocence, Dos Santos remains unable to fully access her wealth due to the asset freezes, and her efforts to defend herself in court have yet to bear fruit.
Despite these setbacks, Isabel dos Santos remains resolute. She acknowledges the complexity of her situation and emphasizes that she is fighting not only for her personal reputation but also for the truth to be heard. With a history of ambition and entrepreneurial drive, Dos Santos has hinted at a possible return to the political stage, suggesting she may one day seek public office in Angola. “To lead is to serve,” she says, reiterating her commitment to the country, whether in business or politics. However, for now, her future remains uncertain, marked by the ongoing struggle to reclaim her fortune and her name.